Filed under: Yoga Musings
A recent post entitled “Where Are All the Hard Yoga Classes?” has generated a lot of interesting and lively discussion on this blog. Much thanks to everyone for sharing your thoughts. I’m seeing a range of opinions being expressed, and this certainly reflects the many different experiences we all have with yoga, and our different attitudes about and conceptions of yoga.
An important and recurring question has arisen from the discussion, and I’d like to take a few moments today to address it. The question is this: Exactly what constitutes an “advanced yoga class”?
In talking to various people, and in reading the emails and postings on this blog, I’m getting the sense that people tend to fall into one of two camps.
The first camp thinks of an advanced yoga class as one where you sweat a lot and push yourself to the physical limits of your body. These people enjoy “advanced” poses like arm balances, deep back-bends, acrobatic inversions, etc., and they tend to shun classes which emphasize the quieter aspects of yoga, such as meditation.
The second camp consists of people who believe that the meditative and/or spiritual aspects of a yoga class are what make it advanced. These people also seem to think that the classes which are focused on asana are not really advanced, because they are missing the whole point of yoga.
Without taking sides, I’d like to point out that these two camps are not (necessarily) mutually exclusive. In other words, it’s not meditation vs. asana. It’s not the spiritual vs. the physical. After all, there is no one “true” definition of yoga, and there are probably just as many different traditions of yoga as there are types of people who do yoga. Even within a given tradition, there are many unique takes on what yoga is really all about.
The crux of the disagreement, I think, is that people in one camp or the other tend to oversimplify what people in the other camp are doing. What follows is my attempt to defend each camp against some of these misconceptions.
In defense of the advanced asana practice.
It is not always true that people who have an asana-centered practice are just doing exercise, without any regard to the mental/spiritual aspects of yoga. In fact, many people who practice a physically intense kind of yoga would argue the exact opposite. A dedicated Ashtanga practitioner might claim, for example, that she practices with such physical intensity because this is a way for her to introduce immediate and great challenge to the senses (and thus the mind). The nature of the challenge in her practice is not to “get the poses right”, but to maintain the proper mental state in relation to these poses, especially as they become more difficult and demanding. And, the Ashtangi might add, she practices the poses ultimately as preparation for sitting meditation. This preparation has both a physical component to it (you do asanas so your body is strong and can sit comfortably for long periods of time) and a mental component to it (through the process of doing asana, you release your mind from its enslavement to the senses). In other words, just because you see someone doing crazy arm balances and acrobatic feats in yoga class, it does not mean that she is the yoga equivalent of a “dumb jock” who is all brawn and no brain. Of course, there are some yogis who focus perhaps too heavily on the physical aspects of yoga, and many of us who do practice a more physical type of yoga often have to fight the tendency to make our entire practice just about the physical. But we struggle like this in our practice because we are flawed, because we are learning, and because we are still on a journey. It is neither constructive, nor necessarily accurate, to say about the person who does amazing physical feats in yoga, “Look, she’s got it all wrong,” when, in fact, she is likely just struggling in her own unique way to deepen her practice.
In defense of an advanced meditative yoga practice.
At my local studio, I’ve been hearing a lot of gripes about “easy” yoga classes. This usually amounts to the complaint that these classes are not physically rigorous enough. There is a potentially false assumption, though, behind these comments. While it is true that some classes will not cause you to break a sweat, that does not mean that these class are not advanced. Many Kundalini yoga classes, for instance, are not physically demanding in the way that, say, an Ashtanga class can be, but one should not then jump to the conclusion that Kundalini classes are easy. One of the most mentally (and physically) demanding things I’ve ever done in a yoga class is chanting “Sat Nam” over and over again with my arms raised over my head for half an hour or so. In other words, just because a yogi isn’t doing Cirque Du Soleil stunts doesn’t mean that she is not doing yoga intensely. After all, no matter what type of yoga you practice, the ultimate target of the practice is the internal (i.e., the mental, the spiritual, or what have you); asanas stand in an important but only contingent relationship to that which is internal.
Personally, I believe that the ideal advanced yoga class would be about 2-3 hours long, consisting of the whole package: intense asana, pranayama, meditation, and some restorative poses. Unfortunately, in this day and age, we typically do not have time for such long classes, so the classes we do take tend to emphasize one thing over the others. This is probably a good reason for trying out different styles of classes, different teachers, and different studios. Also, as with anything, it’s probably a good idea to go into any yoga class with an open mind. Instead of harping on what the teacher has failed to provide or do in class, it might be more beneficial to think about what the teacher is trying to provide or do with the class. You might be pleasantly surprised.
7 Comments so far
Leave a comment
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <pre> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

I agree with your comment of the ideal class being the whole package. This is what I love about participating in yoga workshops at my studio, where we have the “luxury” of having a 3 hour morning practice that also includes longer meditation and pranayama practices.
Comment by Ravi June 23, 2008 @ 1:06 amThis is a pretty futile discussion about tools and methods. It does not make any sense to talk about different styles of yoga if you don’t realize that in the end its just all about awareness and the ability to remain focused. Whatever gets you there is fine: Of course breath is a powerful lever. And yoga is a perfect tool to develop your awareness on your breath and your ability to really breathe at all. But thinking about it as some kind of module-system like: first asanas, then pranayama and finally dhyana is definitely wrong. This would set up barriers, dependencies, stress. And practically speaking you would end up with 3-hour yoga sessions. On the other hand it is all very simple: Just practice, whatever helps to make you more aware, more focused in your daily life. And daily life is where it is really happening, where your awareness has to stand the test. Not in some exquisite moments at the end of 50 minutes of meditation following 30 minutes of nadi sodana following 45 minutes of really tough handstands and backbends and what have you. Easy is right and you just have to listen closely – finally your body will tell you where to go, which asanas to chose and practice. Difficulty and physical challenge wont work as criteria at all.
Comment by Michael June 23, 2008 @ 10:25 amHere’s a thought: Couldn’t it be that people who do yoga just for exercise have just as much right to do what they are doing as anyone else? Who says yoga’s end is “just all about awareness and the ability to remain focused”? Is there some kind of law written that says you can’t just have fun doing yoga, just like someone might have fun playing basketball or going swimming? Why do people who do yoga have to take yoga and themselves so seriously all the time? I do yoga because it’s fun!
Comment by Sarah P. June 23, 2008 @ 1:27 pmI’m quite surprised by your comments, Michael. I was unaware that there is a “definitely wrong” way to think about yoga. Who is setting this standard or the right way or the wrong way to do yoga? Is there a yoga Pope in a yoga Vatican who says “this is how you must do it”? I agree with Sarah that sometimes I just do yoga to let off some steam and because it’s enjoyable.
Comment by Josh June 23, 2008 @ 2:24 pmA very thoughtful post. You are right to defend both “advanced” and “easy” practices.
I started out practicing Ashtanga, and I have to say that the benefits I felt from it were less physical and more spiritual. The practice always felt deeply meditative. I had to give up Ashtanga because I injured my shoulders. What I miss now isn’t the sweat and the sense of accomplishment for doing a rigorous practice, but the flow of it, the continuous attention on the breath, the repetition and ritual.
I find it a little harder to stay focused in an “easier” class, because there is simply so much more talk. I appreciate tremendously the detailed instruction and attention to alignment; I need them to heal my injury. Sometimes, though, it seems like there are too many interruptions; the rhythm of the class feels jerky.
It’s best, I think, to go back and forth if you can. And, like you said, to remember also that we’re all learning, no matter what practice we choose to do.
Comment by Claudia June 25, 2008 @ 2:43 pmAll forms of yoga are beneficial to people as everyone resonates with something different. Here is something I have heard about beginning versus advanced pratitioners: In the beginner, the breath changes and he or she finds it difficult to flow smoothly with the breath. In an advanced practitioner, poses can be held longer and the breath never changes (no matter what is being done). The ego is challenged here… doing the same poses but with greater intention and more fluid breath.
Don’t you find that too many people think they are advanced? We get people that say they have been practicing for years, yet triangle is all askew and they can’t take a deep breath to save their lives. I have found that teaching in levels meets everyone’s needs. “Level 1 child’s pose, level 2 down dog, level 3 vinyasa.” Maybe this should happen more often so everyone can find their place to work no matter the class label.
One last thought… is is easy to get someone to sweat in an easier class– deep ujjayi breathing. Heat the body from the inside out.
Comment by Liz June 27, 2008 @ 7:25 amA good muscle is strong AND flexible. The body is meant to be opened and strong to maintain better energy flows. This is the physical aspect. I agree, Liz. It’s one thing to be able to do crazy arm balances, it’s another to have ease in every pose and quality of breath. There’s always work to be done, in every pose, no matter how many times you’ve done it. There’s always work to be done in every situation. If a teacher or class irritates you, or challenges your ego,there’s personal work there to be done on why and how to resist getting carried away by emotions and remain passive.
Comment by Candice July 3, 2008 @ 12:46 pm